|
You are here >
SWS.org
>
2008 Conference
>
Symposium list |
|
SYMPOSIA AND PANEL DISCUSSIONS
Including those
organized by the
Association of State Wetland Managers
and
The Society for Ecological Restoration
|
SYMPOSIUM: Global
Change and the Function and Distribution of Wetlands
Organized by Beth Middleton
(beth_middleton@usgs.gov)
Sponsored by the
Global Change Ecology Section of SWS
The session will
focus on global patterns in wetland function, with speakers
who study broad latitudinal patterns in functions such as
production, nutrient, and regeneration dynamics. The
overall goal of the symposium is to explore the functional
shifts in wetlands at large regional and global scales, and
how climate change might alter these functions.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM: USEPA's National Wetland Condition Assessment
Organized by Elizabeth Riley
(riley.elizabeth@epa.gov),
Michael Scozzafava (USEPA), Chris Faulkner (USPEA), Mary Kentula (USEPA), Virginia Engle
(USEPA), Janet Nestlerode (USEPA)
The U.S. EPA
anticipates conducting a national survey of wetland
condition, with field work scheduled for 2011 and report due
out in 2013. This survey will be one in a series of
National Water Quality Assessments carried out by EPA in
recent years to provide the public with a better assessment
of the condition of the nation’s waterways. Plans for this
survey are currently underway. EPA Office of Water and ORD
initiated preliminary design discussions in late 2006 and
came to decisions on the sample frame, target population,
and reporting units. In 2008, EPA is hoping to finalize
decisions regarding indicators, reference condition, and
assessment methods.
EPA is
collaborating with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to
ensure that the National Wetland Condition Assessment
effectively complements the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
Status and Trends report. Just as the Status and Trends
Report documents trends in the extent of the nation's
wetlands, EPA’s survey will establish a baseline assessment
of condition for some wetland types. Together, these
reports will offer scientifically defensible information
documenting the current status of wetland quantity and
quality in the United States.
To ensure
the two studies effectively complement one another, EPA will
collaborate with FWS throughout the design and
implementation of the national assessment. Through
preliminary design discussions, it has become clear that FWS
Wetlands Status and Trends plots offer one of the best
sample frame options for a probabilistic national condition
assessment. Compared to other options, the plots provide
more contemporary spatial wetlands data and the highest
probability of a given point actually being a wetland. It
is especially timely that the Service will complete the next
iteration of the wetlands status and trends report in 2010,
just prior to commencement of field operations for the
national wetland condition assessment in 2011.
The purpose of this
session is to engage the Society of Wetlands Scientists in a
dialogue regarding current and future plans for the National
Wetland Condition Assessment. EPA will present the current
design framework and preliminary considerations on
indicators and reference condition. EPA and FWS will
discuss their joint effort to enhance the current population
of FWS Status and Trends plots in areas with sparse
coverage. In addition, EPA and State representatives will
discuss current wetland assessment pilot projects intended
to inform decision making for the national survey. EPA is
hoping the Society can provide technical feedback on
decisions that have already been made and insights on
decisions to come.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
SYMPOSIUM: Advancing Floristic Quality Assessment in
Wetland Plant Assemblages
Organized by Gary N. Ervin
(gervin@biology.msstate.edu) and Jason T. Bried
(jbried@tnc.org)
Floristic Quality Assessment
(FQA) for evaluation of ecological integrity has been tested
widely in the Midwestern states of the US, where it
initially was developed, but it has seen limited use
elsewhere. The FQA index has been described as an attractive
management and assessment tool because of the utility of
herbaceous plant assemblages as indicators of ecosystem
stressors. For example, plants generally respond rapidly to
improvement or degradation of ecosystem condition, and they
may integrate disturbance at numerous biological scales
(from point-source pollutant discharge to non-point source
factors such as urbanization and erosion or siltation). One
major drawback of the present FQA approach is that
coefficients of conservatism for plant species, which are a
major component of FQA, must be developed regionally, but
comprehensive regional listings for plant species and their
distributions generally are lacking. Research and
application also are needed in such areas as mathematically
involving exotic species and testing FQA performance in
forested wetlands. We propose this symposium as an
international forum in which regional findings on the
efficacy of FQA as an assessment tool can be synthesized in
order to permit 1) determination of whether FQA is a concept
that is sufficiently mature to advance the science of
wetland ecosystem assessment, and 2) evaluation of whether
and how the FQA may be improved upon so as to advance its
broader application and conceptual maturity, where needed.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
Disassembly of Coastal Ecosystems in the Face of Global
Change: Implications for Conservation, Management, and
Restoration
Organized by Loretta Battaglia (lbattaglia@plant.siu.edu) and Bill Platt (btplat@lsu.edu)
Coastal
transitions from marine to terrestrial habitats are
jeopardized by two large-scale ongoing changes. First,
sea-level rise is occurring rapidly, perhaps more rapidly
than many species can respond, and rates of rise in sea
level are predicted to accelerate in the future. Second,
anthropogenic modifications of the landscape are chronic,
and these are likely to continue unabated into the future,
especially on the landward end of coastal transitions. Thus
large and permanent changes are occurring at both seaward
and landward ends of coastal transitions.
What are the
dynamics of disassembly and reassembly along coastal
transitions as environments change? As seaward boundaries
are "chipped away" by the sea and seaward ecosystems are
disassembled, species might shift inland, toward the
terrestrial ecosystems of coastal transitions. Limited
reassembly might thus occur landward, provided that species
can migrate landward faster than sea level rises. Such
migration depends on not just the ability to disperse
landward, but also on the capability for colonization of
landward ecosystems. Anthropogenic changes in land use are
likely to compromise the ability of coastal transition
species to colonize landward areas.
Ecological
concepts are needed that explore the mechanisms by which
species migrate with sea level rise, and particularly in the
modern landscape with anthropogenic barriers that are both
physical and political. We propose a symposium for the 2008
SWS annual meeting where speakers will discuss implications
of these changes for conservation, restoration, and
management of these imperiled coastal transition
communities.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
Perceptions, Problems,
and Plans for Wetland Reclamation in the Canadian Oil Sands
Organized by Clara
Qualizza (qualizza.clara@syncrude.com), Dale Vitt (dvitt@plant.siu.edu),
and Kel Wieder
Sponsored by the
Peatlands Section of SWS and
PeatNet
Wetlands cover
about 40% of the natural landscape of the western Canadian
boreal forest. These wetlands are long-term carbon
sinks and currently sequester carbon at an estimated rate of
23 g/m2/yr. Additionally, they provide
habitat for wildlife and play a role in the hydrologic
budget of the region. Oil sands underlie over 140,000
km2 of land surface in northern Alberta and
northwestern Saskatchewan. About 2800 oil sands lease
agreements are in place in Alberta, covering a total land
area of about 44,000 km2. A number of
processes are used to recover bitumen, however, open pit
mining and steam injection are among the most common.
Open pit mining has occurred over the past 40 years and
reclamation of previously mined areas is required by current
leasing agreements with the Alberta government. Fine
sediments, saline surface waters, disturbed hydrologic
regimes, and continental boreal climatic conditions make
reclamation of wetlands a challenge. Active research
programs that address stakeholder concerns and environmental
issues have been funded by industry and organized by joint
government-stakeholder committees. These research
efforts have produced data relevant to wetland issues and
reclamation. This symposium will address the issues
and progress that has been made in wetland reclamation over
the extensive oil sands landscape of Canada's western boreal
forest.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
SYMPOSIUM:
Wetlands in Agricultural Landscapes
Organized by Mark Walbridge (mark.walbridge@ars.usda.gov)
Agricultural
ecosystems often occur in complex landscapes that include
wetland ecosystems. Similarly, agricultural scientists
seeking to reduce the export of nutrients and other
pollutants from agricultural lands, often natural wetlands,
constructed wetlands, riparian buffers, or nutrient removal
technologies that mimic natural wetlands as components of
best management practices and/or nutrient control
strategies. The goals of this symposium is to highlight
wetlands research conducted by agricultural scientists for
the broader wetland science community, and to foster
interactions between agricultural and wetland scientists.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
SYMPOSIUM: Wetlands as Sentinels of Climate Change:
Effects on Goods and Services
Organized by Colleen Charles (colleen_charles@usgs.gov)
and Steve Faulkner (sfaulkner@usgs.gov)
Climate change
affects ecosystems as well as human populations. Future
climate change predictions differ in different parts of the
U.S. It is believed that most areas will continue to warm,
with some areas warming more than others. It is difficult
to predict which parts of the U.S. and North America will become wetter or
drier, but increased precipitation and evaporation are
expected with potential changes in ecosystems across the
landscape. The middle parts of the U.S. are expected to
have drier soils and northern regions such as Alaska are
expected to experience the greatest warming. Wetlands are
found in all of these landscapes and provide many goods and
services such as fisheries productivity, wildlife habitat,
water quality, groundwater recharge, flood attenuation,
carbon sequestration, and
important stopover areas for migrating waterfowl. Wetlands
may well be the sentinels for potential threshold changes in
the landscape in a changing climate effecting water
availability in a spatial and temporal scale. This
symposium will provide a broad overview of climate change
and the effects on wetlands as sustainable ecosystems and
the implications for adaptation and mitigation to cope with
changing landscapes. Regional examples will be presented to
illustrate the on-going science to address climate change
questions.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
The
USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project – Wetlands
Component: Developing the Scientific Framework to Improve
Decisions Affecting Wetland Ecosystems in U.S. Agricultural
Landscapes
Organized by
S. Diane Eckles
(diane.eckles@wdc.usda.gov)
Between 2002 and 2006 more
than $1 billon in federal funds were spent to continue
support of the USDA-administered Wetlands Reserve Program
and more than $15 million was spent in FY 2005 alone to
support wetland conservation under the Farmable Wetlands
Program. The ability to credibly document the results of
this investment is challenging. A science-based,
collaborative approach is needed to routinely produce
results that decision-makers and conservation stakeholders
can use to improve and ensure wetlands conservation on
agricultural landscapes. The USDA Conservation Effects
Assessment Project – Wetlands Component (CEAP-Wetlands) is
designed to 1) Provide science-based data, results and
information to inform conservation decisions affecting
wetlands and the ecosystem services they provide; and 2)
Develop a broad collaborative foundation that facilitates
the production and delivery of scientific data, results and
information on the effects of USDA conservation practice and
program implementation. This 2-session symposium
will feature presentations that are intended to inform
scientists, decision-makers, restoration practitioners,
resource managers and interested parties about CEAP-Wetlands
and the results or status of scientific investigations and
analyses underway.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
The
Role of Ecosystem Restoration in Mitigating Climate Change
Organized by Ryan Szuch (rszuch@environcorp.com)
and Scott Luchessa (sluchessa@environcorp.com)
Sponsored by the
Global Change Ecology Section of SWS
This symposium
aims to highlight the role of ecosystem restoration in
mitigating climate change and in demonstrating how carbon
credits can help advance ecosystem restoration and
preservation programs. As regulations on greenhouse gases evolve and
voluntary climate change programs grow, interest
in biological carbon sequestration is increasing.
Biological carbon sequestration (or bio-sequestration) is
one means for capturing atmospheric carbon dioxide by
storing carbon in plant tissue and soils.
Bio-sequestration projects, in the form of reforestation,
have already been approved as part of the Kyoto Protocol. Other forms
of ecosystem restoration, such as grassland
and tidal marsh restoration, represent viable alternatives
for bio-sequestration. At present, non-forest-related
projects are limited primarily to the voluntary carbon
market. Carbon credits from restoration projects can
be sold or either regulated on voluntary carbon markets.
In this way, carbon sequestration has become an important
consideration in restoration and land use planning.
Derivation of carbon credits represents a funding source for
restoration/preservation projects and an incentive for
private landowners to participate in such projects. This symposium
will educate us on how forestry and reforestation
bio-sequestration projects have developed, and how we will
learn now wetlands are already being introduced into some
carbon credit programs.
(Click here for confirmed speaker
list)
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
Integrated
Wetland, Stream, and Floodplain Restoration - A Focus on
Water Resources
Organized by Joe Berg (jberg@biohabitats.com)
and Keith Underwood (bogs@comcast.net)
Performing restoration for mitigation or stewardship
purposes tomorrow using today's practices will not meet our
needs or provide significant benefit to our resources or
society. Instead, each of us in the resource community needs
to adopt more integrative methods for our mitigation and
stewardship projects to provide the fuller benefits that
whole system restoration yields. This symposium follows-up
on the field trip to Howards Branch and Wilelinor restoration
projects in Anne Arundel County, Maryland to further develop
and support a broader-based understanding of integrated
wetland, stream, and floodplain restoration. In addition to
providing information on specific design elements for the
projects visited on the field trip, we will present an
innovative application of integrated stream and wetland
restoration for safe conveyance and reuse of stormwater. We
will also provide foundation information on sediment supply
and characteristics of that supply in legacy sediments as
well as from the highest density and most integrated streams
draining watersheds -- headwater streams. This
understanding is critical to developing a deep appreciation
for integrated restoration and changing the status quo. We
will also hear about considerations in Maryland for a
moratorium on restoration growing from the a recent Best
Management Practices report that indicates that
current restoration projects do not provide cost-effective
nutrient and sediment reduction relative to any other
method. Based on comprehensive restoration monitoring
and an evaluation of restoration site effectiveness for
nitrogen cycling, University of Maryland researchers have
identified restoration elements that have higher
effectiveness for nitrogen removal. Through integrating
these design elements, we can implement restoration projects
that provide important social and natural resource values.
This may be the best approach to restoration implementation
if projects are to compete for tighter money supplies with
other water quality improvement projects. We'll also hear
how the integrated restoration approach can have significant
benefit for reducing pathogenic bacteria populations
delivered during periods of elevated flows. Finally, we
will discuss integrated restoration as a form of
regenerative design, which increases natural capital,
provides significant benefit to society, is sustained by
positive feedback, and has great potential to mirror natural
systems in the development of complexity and resilience over
time.
|
|
SYMPOSIUM:
State/Federal
Coordination: Responding to Challenges in Public Policy to
Conserve and Protect Wetlands
Organized by Jeanne Christie (jeanne.christie@aswm.org)
and the
Association of State Wetland Managers
2008 will be a year of change in wetland and water policy at
the state, tribal and national levels. The state/federal
coordination symposium organized by the Association of State
Wetland Managers will cover important revisions in federal
and state wetland policy where the application of sound
science will be critical to the delivery of balanced
programs to protect the public’s interest in clean water.
Topics will include: upcoming changes in federal wetland
policy, the wetlands delineation manual supplements, climate
change, the new Federal Geographic Data Committee wetland
mapping standard, opportunities for streamlining permitting,
discussion on the new federal mitigation rule,
implementation and revisions to the Carabell/Rapanos
guidance and strengthening the states’ role in implementing
the Clean Water Act. The symposium is designed to
facilitate discussion among state and tribal wetland program
managers, federal agencies, scientists and other wetland
professionals to prepare for the challenges ahead.
This symposium consists of six sessions, as follows (see the
schedule for times and rooms):
Thursday, 29 May
ASWM: Changes in Federal Water Policy
ASWM: Wetland Delineation Manual
ASWM: Streamlining Permitting
ASWM: Wetlands and Water Resource
Mapping
Friday, 30 May
ASWM: Strengthening the State's Role
in Implementing Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
ASWM: State Programmatic General
Permits
|
PANEL DISCUSSION: Revisiting the 1995 NAS
Characterization Report
Organized by James
McCulley (jim@jcmenv.com)
How many people
remember the proposed Wetland Manual revisions in 1991?
How about the 1989 Wetland Delineation Manual? This
was a time when the credibility of the regulatory practices
regarding wetlands was routinely challenged. At the
request of Congress, the National Research Council formed a
committee that would study the scientific basis for the
characterization of wetlands. This committee was
formed in 1993 and included representatives from academia,
business, and environmental groups. This committee met
at various locations throughout the country, went into the
field, and had many roundtable discussions before issuing
their report in 1995. This report, "Wetlands:
Characteristics and Boundaries," is probably on many
people's bookshelves and is a valuable reference document.
This panel discussion will include a review of the crucial
issues, a recap of interesting discussions, a glimpse into
the process, and a question and answer session of the 15th
year anniversary of the formation of the committee.
Panelists and their topics
are:
Fred
Bosselman Professor of Law, Kent State University
Mark Brinson,
Professor, Department of Biology, East Carolina university
James
McCulley, JCM Environmental
William
Mitsch,
Distinguished Professor of Environment and Natural Resources
at Ohio State University and Editor-in-Chief of Ecological Engineering, the
Journal of Ecosystem Restoration
Wayne Skaggs,
William Neal Reynolds Professor and Distinguished University
Professor, North Carolina State University
Margaret
Strand, Partner, Venable LLP, Washington, DC
|
|
PANEL DISCUSSION:
Coastal Habitat Restoration and Climate Change – Priorities
for the Future
Organized by
Jennifer Wallace (Jenni.Wallace@noaa.gov),
Kristin Rusello (NOAA), Ellen Cummings (US ACOE),
Susan Mangin (USFWS), Greg Colianno (USEPA), Percy Magee (NRCS)
The intent of this panel is to broaden the restoration
community’s and policymakers’ understanding of climate
change impacts on coastal habitat restoration and
protection. As coastal impacts related to climate
change increase, agencies and organizations that restore
habitat must take into account a range of future scenarios
(higher sea level, warmer ocean temperatures, etc.) and be
strategic about funding and locating new projects. In
addition, a dialogue on restoration techniques and
methodologies, taking into account resiliency and the
effects of climate change on habitat restoration projects,
needs to occur.
Four panelists representing
federal, state, and non-governmental organizations with
expertise in habitat restoration, research, or policy-making
will provide insight into the prioritization of coastal
habitat restoration in the face of climate change. Panelists
will discuss current knowledge, research gaps and needs, and
ideas for new criteria for planning, siting, and monitoring
coastal habitat restoration projects that take climate
change into account.
The Estuary Restoration Act
(ERA) of 2000 established restoration of estuaries as a
national priority, and set an ambitious goal of restoring
one million acres of estuarine habitat by the year 2010.
The federal agencies (Army Corps of Engineers, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental
Protection Agency, Fish and Wildlife Service and Natural
Resource Conservation Service) with responsibility to
implement the Act have a critical role in protecting and
restoring coastal and estuarine habitat with partners across
the country. The discussions during this panel will
help inform ERA agencies on how best to prioritize habitat
restoration of estuaries nationwide.
Panelists and their topics
are:
Virginia
Burkett, Chief Scientist for Global Change Research,
U.S. Geological Survey - Climate Change: Implications for
Coastal Ecosystems and their Restoration
Kevin Knuuti,
Engineering Division Chief, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers -
Climate Change and Coastal Wetlands: New Research and
Policy Changes
Gwen
Shaughnessy, Coastal Hazard Planner, Maryland Department
of Natural Resources - Climate Change Planning in
Maryland: Developing a Strategy to Reduce Vulnerability
Jeff DeBlieu,
Climate Change Learning Networks leader, the Nature
Conservancy - Adapting to (and living with) Sea-level
Rise
|
|
PANEL DISCUSSION: Forum on Ethics: The Role of Ethics and the Professional
Wetland Scientist
Organized by: Jim
Perry (jperry@vims.edu),
Jim Wiggins and Royal Gardner
Webster's New World Dictionary defines the term "ethics" as
a system or code of morals of a particular person, group, or
profession. A society adopts morals to guide its
members' conduct, or behavior, in a way that sustains the
society. Many professional societies do the same.
When the Society of Wetland Scientists first came into
being, one of the more important things that they did was to
codify a Code of Ethics. The Code designed to assure
that members of the Society meet a level of moral conduct
that leads to an ethically fair, reasonable, and
academically sound basis for the practice of wetland science
and management. With that in mind, the SWS
Professional Certification Program (SWS-PCP) adopted a
similar Code of Ethics, and established an Ethics Committee
to oversee potential violations of the Code. This Code
was designated to assure that those individuals certified by
SWS-PCP as Professional Wetland Scientists or as Wetland
Professionals in Training meet that level. The purpose
of this forum is to continue a discussion of the role of
ethics in the SWS-PCP community that began at the Sacramento
meeting in 2007. The Forum will include a
representative from the academic, consulting, development,
legal, and regulatory communities. presentations will
discuss the formation of the SWS-PCP ethics criteria and
standing rules, the importance of ethics criteria to the
business and regulatory community, and the legal
ramifications involved in enforcing ethics complaints and
penalties. Audience participation and questions will
be encouraged.
Panelists
are:
Dr. James
Perry, Secretary-General SWS-PCP, Professor of Marine
Science, Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Mr. Jim
Wiggins, President, ASTI
Ms. Kimberly
Connor, Esq., Associate Professor of Law, University of
South Carolina School of Law
Mr. Steve
Martin, Corps Institute for Water Resources, ℅U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Norfolk, Virginia
|
|
PANEL DISCUSSION: Global Climate Change and the Future Direction of
Wetland Restoration - New Perspectives from SER
Organized by: Kevin
Erwin (KLErwin@environment.com)
and Sasha Alexander (sasha@ser.org)
and the Society
for Ecological Restoration
Climate change can be expected to act in conjunction with a
range of other stressors, many of which, depending on the
region, are a concern for wetlands and their water
resources. Wetland systems are vulnerable and particularly
susceptible to changes in both the quantity and quality of
water supply. It appears that climate change will have
its most pronounced effect on wetlands through alterations
in hydrological regimes - specifically, the nature and
variability of the hydroperiod and the number and severity
of extreme events. As the underlying fundamentals of wetland
ecosystems and mega-watersheds continue to experience change,
restoration scientists and practitioners have begun to
re-examine the concepts of planning, goals, and wetland
management. The effects of climate change probably
will be
exacerbated by other human-induced stressors such as
unsustainable development and agricultural conversion to
increase the loss, degradation and transformation of
wetlands around the world. As a result, important
provisioning and regulating services provided by both
coastal and interior wetlands are being threatened as never
before. In the future, wetland restoration may become a
critical management tool to mitigate the impacts of climate
change by replacing lost ecosystems and providing buffers to
damaged ecosystems. The Society for Ecological
Restoration (SER) International is now in the process of
revisiting a number of important concepts and paradigms for
ecological restoration in the face of global climate change
and other anthropogenic disturbances. The intent of this
panel is to address the role of restoration and adaptive
management techniques in promoting ecosystem resilience
given the increased levels of stress and uncertainty due to
climate change and unrelenting human pressures. The panel
will feature short presentations, case studies, and audience
participation.
Panelists are:
Keith Bowers,
President of Biohabitats, Inc. and Vice Chair of the Society
for Ecological Restoration
Kevin L.
Erwin, President and Principal Ecologist, Kevin L. Erwin
Consulting Ecologist, Inc.
William J.
Platt, Professor of Ecology and Conservation Biology,
Louisiana State University
William J.
Mitsch, Distinguished Professor of Environment and
Natural Resources at Ohio State University and
Editor-in-Chief of Ecological Engineering, the
Journal of Ecosystem Restoration
|
|